Print page Send link

Litigation on behalf of Norwegian company

21 Jun 2021

The law firm represented a company incorporated in Norway in a dispute with a Lithuanian company regarding the award of a debt for intermediation services related to the newly developed universal grid-connected hybrid electric vehicle (iPHEV) transmission system. The debtor, a company registered in Lithuania, stated that it had never entered into any agreement with the Norwegian company. The debtor submitted that the obligation to pay the debt to the Lithuanian company did not arise. Another cooperation agreement between the Norwegian company and other Lithuanian company controlled by the same shareholders allegedly does not prove a relationship between the companies involved in the dispute. 

Our law firm was able to prove the existence of an oral agreement between the parties to the dispute. The written evidence in the case, the explanations of the representatives of the parties, as well as the explanations of the witnesses, established that the plaintiff, a company established in Norway, had entered into an oral agreement with a Lithuanian company regarding intermediation services. The case law of the Court of Cassation, formed by interpreting and applying the legal norms regulating the provision of remunerated services, clarifies that the contract for the provision of remunerated services is best distinguished from the subject-matter of the contract by other related contracts - intangible (intellectual) or other services not related to the creation of the tangible object, i. e. these services may or may not have an objective expression. 

Intermediation is a type of service, the essence of which is to find a buyer for goods (services), a producer (service provider) - a customer, and so forth. Having assessed the evidence gathered in the case, the court ruled out that there were sufficient grounds to believe that the Norwegian company had duly fulfilled its obligations to provide intermediation services to the Lithuanian company. The claim was upheld in full, with the Norwegian company being awarded a debt of approximately half a hundred thousand euros from the Lithuanian company.

The Lithuanian Court of Appeal upheld the conclusions of the Court of First Instance and dismissed the appeal of the Lithuanian company. The total debt claimed, together with legal costs and statutory interest has been recovered in full from the debtor since the date on which the proceedings were instituted.

Back to the news list

Highlights

Lithuania: Key Tax Changes Effective 1 January 2026

2 Jan 2026

As from 1 January 2026, Lithuania isimplementing a wide-ranging tax reform

Advising on Cross-Border Sale and Delivery of Legacy 650 Business Jet

2 Oct 2025

Šulija & Partners supported the successful cross-border sale and delivery of an Embraer business jet, acting as joint legal counsel from LOI to closing

Sulija & Partners Advises GetJet Airlines on high profile ACMI contract

1 Oct 2025

Šulija & Partners supports GetJet Airlines in strategic capacity deal with Etihad Airways

Client Alert: Fly PLAY hf. Ceases Operations and Cancels Flights

29 Sep 2025

PLAY Ceases Operations: What Passengers and Creditors Need to Know?

More news...

Šulija Partners Law Firm Vilnius, registered office Jogailos street 11, Vilnius, LT-01116, Lithuania, fax +370 52051926, e-mail: info@SulijaPartners.com

Contact details | Sitemap | Know your customer | Privacy policy | Feedback | Links | Terms and Conditions | Attorney advertising | Copyright Back to the top